The agency has come out with several grounds to challenge the August 11 order of the Bombay High Court granting anticipatory bail to Setalvad and her husband Javed Anand, after it was denied by the sessions court.
CBI has sought cancellation of their anticipatory bail claiming that the high court had erred in giving relief after 'prima facie' finding that Foreign Contribution Regulation Act (FCRA) provisions were violated, as their company, Sabrang Communication and Publishing Pvt Ltd (SCPPL), had received Rs 1.8 crore from US-based Ford Foundation without mandatory approval from the Centre.

While the couple has denied all charges saying they have been victimised for taking up the cause of riots victims, the agency said after 'prima facie' holding that there was misuse of funds they had received from Ford Foundation for which they were 'undoubtedly answerable', the High Court ought not have granted anticipatory bail by using its extraordinary discretionary powers.
The CBI said,“The high court ought to have considered that it was not a fit case for granting anticipatory bail to the couple as the alleged offence against them can have a direct nexus with activity detrimental to the national interest, communal harmony, and the same cannot be unearthed by collecting the bank accounts or from the agreements alone.”

Latest News from India News Desk