Mumbai: The Bombay High Court has said that government would have no say in controlling fee structure of private unaided schools, which do not get ‘grant-in-aid’ but spend huge amount of money from their own funds to give facilities to the students. (Agencies)
Accordingly, the Court set aside an order passed by Education department of Maharashtra Government, directing a private unaided school to refund fees to a group of students from academic year 2006-07 to 2011-12, as the school did not have affiliation to ICSE.
Hearing a petition filed by Diamond Jubilee High School in Mazgaon, central Mumbai, Justices SJ Vajifdar and MS Sonak said, that there was nothing to indicate that petitioners (school authorities) had acted malafide.
The judges opined that the right to establish an Educational Institution is a right guaranteed by the Constitution and as such any restriction upon such right can be placed only by law enacted by legislature and not by a Circular or a Resolution issued under Article 162 of the Constitution of India.
The School had filed a petition challenging an order passed on November 27, 21012, by Principal Secretary, School Education and Sports Department of Maharashtra Government, asking the authorities to refund fees to students from academic year 2006-07 to 2011-12.
Diamond Jubilee High School, a minority educational institution, was affilitated to Maharashtra State Board of Secondary and Higher Secondary Education (SSCE Board) upto academic year 2006-07. The School was receiving aid from the Government till this period. However, thereafter it decided to decline aid and convert itself into a private unaided school.
The school resolved to convert affiliation from SSCE Board to ICSE, in respect of secondary section of the school, i.e from standard 'V' onwards. In this regard, the necessary permissions were applied for and obtained. The conversion was to take place progressively, which means that each year one higher class would stop receiving aid.
Mumbai: The Bombay High Court has said that government would have no say in controlling fee structure of private unaided schools, which do not get ‘grant-in-aid’ but spend huge amount of money from their own funds to give facilities to the students.