"We have seen the judgement related to the indictment of January 9. It is good as far as it goes," spokesperson in the Ministry of External Affairs said. 
He said the lawyers will meet to "examine it carefully before we are able to respond substantially and in more detail".

Khobragade, who was India's deputy consul-general in New York, was arrested on December 12 outside her children's school.  
She has won dismissal of the indictment against her for visa fraud, with a US judge ruling she had full diplomatic immunity. However, prosecutors are not barred from bringing new charges in future.

READ MORE: US court dismisses Devyani's indictment in visa fraud case
Reacting to US court verdict, her father Uttam Khobragade said, "They tried to trap Devyani with a false complaint against her. I thank the Indian government and the Indians for their cooperation and help. She will go back to America with full diplomatic immunity".
US District Judge Shira Scheindlin said in her 14-page order that "it is undisputed" that Khobragade acquired full diplomatic immunity at 5:47 pm on January 8 after US State Department approved her accreditation as a counselor to India's mission to the United Nations.
While the indictment was returned on January 9, Khobragade had the immunity till she departed from US for India on the evening of January 9 and so the prosecutors cannot proceed with the current indictment.

US-based Indian lawyer hopes Devyani isn't re-indicted

An eminent Indian-American attorney said one should hope that the Indian diplomat is not re-indicted on new charges.
Attorney Ravi Batra, who represents the Congress party and its leader Sonia Gandhi in various human rights violation cases filed here, said through the order on Khobragade's motion, Scheindlin has "rightly acknowledged" the immunity that External Affairs Minister Salman Khurshid negotiated with the US State Department.
"Judge Scheindlin's order today vindicates both judicial independence and judicial excellence - she rightly acknowledged the immunity that Khurshid negotiated with our State Department in January and its consequential effect on the indictment unsealed on January 9th," Batra told a news agency in an email, responding to the judge's order that caps three months of a tense diplomatic standoff between the US and India.
"What is also clear is that on December 12th, when Devyani was arrested, she did not enjoy immunity from the arrest. One can only hope that US Attorney Preet Bharara's exercise of prosecutorial discretion results in not re-indicting Devyani," he said.
"There has been enough pain and suffering bilaterally, and we need these two countries to re-join the call of destiny: to help form a more perfect world," Batra said.
While the indictment against Khobragade on visa fraud charges and making false statements on the visa application of her domestic help Sangeeta Richard has been dismissed, the ruling by the judge does not bar prosecutors from bringing a fresh indictment against her in the future.
She said "even if Khobragade had no immunity at the time of her arrest and has none now, her acquisition of immunity during the pendency of proceedings mandates dismissal".
The judge ruled that the government "may not proceed on an indictment obtained when Khobragade was immune from the jurisdiction of the court".
"The court has no occasion to decide whether the acts charged in the indictment constitute "official acts" that would be protected by residual immunity. However, if the acts charged in the indictment were not 'performed in the exercise of official functions', then there is currently no bar to a new indictment against Khobragade," the order said.


Latest News from India News Desk