The Commission directed the CEO to pay a compensation of Rs 10,000 to one Sumit whose name was deleted from the voters' list without him being informed even though he did not change his residential address. He could not vote in 2015 Assembly election here.
"The voter has a right to know, first that his name was deleted, then the reasons for the decision to delete his name from the voters' list.
"Such an arbitrary decision and denial of information even after deletion, followed by non-response to RTI request for that deletion would certainly amount to denial of very significant constitutional and statutory right to vote and right to information under the RTI Act," Information Commissioner Sridhar Acharyulu said.
Issuing a show cause notice to the CPIO of the CEO's office asking why a penalty should not be imposed for failure to furnish the information, Acharyulu also directed it to inform the appellant reasons for deleting his name from the voters' list and if any inquiry was conducted into the matter.
He also directed the CEO office to carry out an inquiry into the matter (if no such inquiry took place) and to inform the appellant what action has been proposed to be taken against officer responsible for the deletion of the name.
"Not only the appellant, each voter whose valid voting right is violated by arbitrary decision of the officer without communicating reasons and giving an opportunity to represent why his name should be removed, is entitled to such compensation if he was not allowed to vote on that ground, and restoration of voting rights within reasonable time," he said.

Latest News from India News Desk