Dismissing a petition filed by R Lakshmi, wife of a freedom fighter, Justice S Vaidhyanathan of the Madurai bench said, "The question of automatic extension of SSSCP on the ground that the husband of the petitioner was getting SFFP, would be putting a premium and opening a pandora's box of similar claim by others".

Though courts would come to the rescue of freedom fighters and their families in granting pension, in this case the petitioner had not substantiated her case by producing any material documents, much less recommendation by the state government to the Centre for grant of Central Government Pension to her husband, the judge said.
Besides, the Indian National Army (INA) form produced by her was only a self declaration which contained the history of INA personnel.
The petitioner had claimed her husband was a freedom fighter getting state pension. He made a claim for SSSCP from July 20, 1972 till his death on November 23, 2008. He did not get it.

Hence, she prayed for a direction from the court to give SSSCP from 1972 to November 2008, which her husband would have got had he been alive, with nine percent interest, and also family pension from 2008 onwards.



Latest News from State News Desk