The apex court also expressed its displeasure over BCCI's stand that being a private and autonomous body, it cannot accommodate a nominee of CAG in it as suggested by the Justice RM Lodha Panel on the ground that it would be derecognised from the International Cricket Council (ICC).
"You are discharging public function... how best your functioning can be improved? It has to be transparent and visible .. the way you are doing (discharging your function) and how you are doing," a bench of Chief Justice TS Thakur and Justice FMI Kalifulla said.
Taking note of the submission made by BCCI counsel and senior advocate KK Venugopal, the bench said, "What we understand is that you are suggesting that I am answerable to Registrar of Societies. I will be accountable only to Registrar of the society. I will be amenable to criminal law but I will not reform. Don't ask me to reform. Is it possible?”

"What have you done? We have seen the allegations of match fixing and betting. You have no control over these. But you give money in crores. The Lodha committee has said something. It has been said to make the functioning more transparent and visible and the effort is to reform the BCCI," it was observed.
"You are dealing with hundreds of crores of rupees. Do you say that you have complete immunity over it and you can't be questioned? Do you say that you can't be questioned how you spend hundreds of crores of rupees if not thousands that you collect from the public. Can we record that statement," the bench observed.

Venugopal replied in affirmative to the bench's suggestion that collection of funds by selling tickets and through advertisements, BCCI has total control over it and it cannot be questioned.

The bench said it was going into the issue but made it clear that it was not comparing BCCI with other sporting associations like wrestling, table tennis or kho-kho.

Supreme Court pulls up BCCI for financial irregularities

Latest News from Sports News Desk