"For anyone, it would apply for the length of time that they have that diplomatic status. But it doesn't retroactively wipe out past discretions," State Department spokesperson Jen Psaki said on Friday.

Read More: Need to protect partnership with India, says US

"Receiving diplomatic immunity does not nullify any previously existing criminal charges. Those remain on the books. Nor does obtaining diplomatic immunity protect the diplomat from prosecution indefinitely. It relates to the status of a diplomat's current status for the length of the time of that status," Psaki said.

Read More: Processing request to accredit Devyani, says UN

Diplomatic immunity means, among other things, that a foreign diplomat is not subject to criminal jurisdiction in United States for the time they are a diplomat, for the time they have that immunity, she said. She added that, “when immunity is conferred, it does not retroactively take effect at a previous point in time but relates solely to the diplomat's current status."

"So, I think some of the confusion here has been if there is a change in status, does that mean that there is a clean slate from past charges. There's not," Paski said.

After her arrest on visa fraud charges in New York last week, Khobragade was transferred this week from the Indian consulate to its Permanent Mission at the UN.

She also said that US is yet to get an official request "through the proper channels for accreditation", and hinted the full diplomatic immunity would remain till the time she is posted at the UN.

Khobragade, a 1999-batch IFS officer, was arrested and then handed over to US Marshals Service (USMS).  Khobragade was taken into custody before being released on a USD 250,000 bond after pleading not guilty in court. She could face a maximum sentence of ten years for visa fraud and five years for making a false declaration if convicted.


Latest News from World News Desk